Skip to content

The Desecration of Charlie Kirk

They have to kill him twice.

By Clay··20 min read

Tyler Robinson didn't kill Charlie Kirk. He just pulled the trigger.

The truth is, Charlie was already marked for death by a class of people. The same people who marked Donald Trump for death. The same people who will mark you and those you love for death, if you become too much of a problem for them.

They don't really want to kill you. In fact, they'd rather not.

It's a messy business, this whole murder thing.

It's just, you really need to submit.

And by submission, I don't mean agreement. They really couldn't care less if you're a total goose-stepping fascist posting to 300 followers on twitter or a classical liberal sipping wine while you read Sowell by your fireplace. You're allowed to have whatever opinions you want.

What you're not allowed to have is power. Charlie got a little too close, and so he had to go.

It's not personal. It's politics.

Act 1

The tyrant dies and his rule is over, the martyr dies and his rule begins.

Soren Kierkegaard • journals • 1848

That's what I posted to my Facebook page the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. I didn't explain it, I didn't post a comment… I just posted that quote above a picture of Charlie, memorializing his life.

I still can't decide if that quote is cope or not. I posted it because I wanted it to be true. If Charlie's gone, then his death must mean something. We have to make it mean something!

I've never felt so much righteous indignation in my life.

And I know that millions of you feel the same, because that post went viral in a way I've never experienced before, and am unlikely to ever experience again. I felt the raw power of Charlie's influence moving through my page the day he died.

I had been a fan of Charlie for years, passively consuming his content for entertainment. I liked him, but I was also critical of him. I was still very much in my losertarian phase. So focused on my principles that I couldn't see reality, and had zero sense of political strategy.

I actually thought I knew better than Charlie. I really believed that.

Then, they killed him, and it's like a switch flipped in my brain. The world started to make sense. The reality of politics became clear. And for the first time, I could actually see what Charlie was building.

I was born 8 years before Charlie, but he was somehow 100 years wiser than I was.

The so-called 'marketplace of ideas' is, in fact, not a marketplace at all. It is a battlefield. Charlie was fighting the real war, trying to take real ground, while my libertarian friends and I argued in the halls of a marketplace that doesn't even exist.

I watched his memorial… that enormous event in the stadium, with hundreds of thousands of people. I watched the people who loved him try to put his life into words. I mourned him for months. I'm still mourning him now.

So, who was this man they were so desperate to defeat?

The most dangerous man in American politics ran on Starbucks mint tea. Mint Majesty, two honeys, all day long… because he talked so much, it was the only thing that kept him from losing his voice.

He stood at 6'5" tall, and he liked to joke about how he had descended from the Nephilim, the giants of the Old Testament.

He could effortlessly throw a football 50 yards just to show everyone who said he couldn't, that he could… and he had a big smile that spawned a million memes, most of them unkind. He kept smiling anyway.

So how does a goofy giant with a big smile and an odd Starbucks habit become the most dangerous man in American politics?

It started with a folding card table lodged in the basement of his parents' house. He lugged that thing to the nearest university with a homemade sign that said BIG GOVERNMENT SUCKS.

He was 18 years old, the age men can be drafted into war.

That little card table was the entire operation. That was Turning Point USA in 2012.

A decade later, that card table had become the largest conservative youth machine in America. Seven hundred employees. Seventy million dollars a year. Hundreds of chapters.

He filled arenas with the same kids the experts swore were gone for good. He turned out the youth vote that helped put Trump back in the White House… the President credited him for it himself.

Every year, those campuses produce the next generation of the progressive militia. The teachers, the journalists, the bureaucrats, the politicians, the judges… whoever holds this territory writes the future, and it was theirs, unchallenged for sixty years.

But then there was this damn kid, and his damn card table, setting up shop right in the middle of their territory…

And he just would not go away.

Act 2

Transphobe. Racist. Far-right Extremist. White Supremacist. Fascist.

And those were the polite ones.

The Sacramento Bee said Charlie "called for the lynching of trans people" while he was still alive. They were forced to apologize after he challenged it.

Called for the lynching of trans people. Quite an accusation.

So, is there any truth to it? Did Charlie hate trans people?

Let me show what happened when one of them stepped up to his microphone.

A few months before Charlie was killed, a young woman named Sebastian did exactly that. She said she was transgender, and started to ask her question, something about what age kids should be able to start taking hormones. Charlie's own crowd started heckling and talking over her.

Charlie stopped them.

Please give our speaker some uninterrupted speaking time.

Charlie Kirk

Before Charlie said a single word about the issue itself, his first instinct was to protect her voice… from his own crowd.

When she was done, Charlie didn't lie to her, or try to soften his message to win her over. He told her he's against giving hormones to children, and went further, telling her that he'd lost trust in the medical industry to prescribe any of it in a way that actually helps the patient.

Sebastian didn't push back. She agreed with him. "I get that", she said. "I'm scared too, because I don't know what's true, what's not. Would this even help me?" And Charlie, instead of pressing the point and taking the political victory, he softened his voice… "Tell me," he said "Are you comfortable telling me your story?"

And she told him. She'd known since the third grade, she said. She was nineteen now, almost twenty. She'd been going by a different name since middle school. But she didn't know what was true about the medical side of it. She'd heard a hundred different opinions from a hundred different people… and she wanted to hear Charlie's.

"First of all" Charlie said, "thank you so much for that." And then he gave her the hard truth, gently. He told her he was about to say something that almost no one in her life would ever tell her… and he asked her to think and pray about it.

I actually want to see you be comfortable in how you were born. I know you might not feel that way, but I think that's something you can achieve. I think that with the right team and the right people, you don't have to wage war on your body. You can learn to love your body.

Charlie Kirk

There's your transphobic bigot.

But the Sacramento Bee was far from alone…

The day after Charlie was murdered, Stephen King said Charlie "advocated stoning gays to death". He too was later forced to apologize.

One of the best selling authors in human history, repeating a lie about a dead man to his massive audience. What was he thinking? Only Stephen can answer that for himself.

I can speculate.

I'm not convinced that Stephen King is an evil man. I don't think he woke up that morning intending to tell a lie about a murdered father. In fact, I wish that was all this was. That's much easier to explain.

The truth is more chilling… he really believed it. He thought he was telling the truth. Stephen didn't decide for himself that Charlie was a monster. He didn't spend his time watching his videos, or listening to him on the radio. He had no idea who Charlie was, or what he was like.

So, how did Stephen King know that Charlie "advocated stoning gays to death"? Did he come up with that idea all on his own?

No, he was told.

He was told a man was a monster, over and over, by everyone he trusts, until it stopped feeling like something he'd been told and started feeling like something he knew. Like the sky is blue. You don't fact check the sky.

Everybody knows the sky is blue!

Everybody knows Charlie is a hateful person.

Stephen King knew it. Your aunt who shares NPR articles knew it. The HR lady at your office knew it. Your kid's teacher with the rainbow flag on her desk knew it. The barista with the pronoun pin knew it. The people celebrating his murder knew it.

Tyler Robinson knew it.

Hey fascist! Catch!

engraved on ammunition recovered at the scene • charging documents • Utah County • September 2025

So Tyler is a hero in this world. He killed a fascist. A monster.

Whatever happens to him, his story is over. He's not important.

Charlie was convicted and sentenced to death long before he was shot. Not by a court. Not by a jury… by a class of people who consider themselves to be the rightful managers of America. The class that has ruled unopposed since at least FDR.

This is who told Stephen King that Charlie wanted to stone gays and convinced Tyler Robinson that Charlie was a fascist.

It's not a conspiracy, it's a consensus.

Have you ever watched a flock of birds? A murmuration.

Thousands of them, turning in the sky at once.

Where's the leader?

Go ahead and look for it. You won't find one. Every single bird in that flock is doing one simple thing: watching the few birds closest to it and matching them. That's it. No bird sees the whole shape, or gets to decide what form it takes.

That's the consensus. That's why Stephen King believed Charlie wanted to stone gays, and it's why Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. Nobody gave either of them an order. The flock doesn't give orders… it murmurs. And every bird adjusts.

They're just flying with their flock.

You probably know what this is like. If you are human, you are a social creature. You flock too. It's okay. We all do.

Tyler and Stephen weren't aware of this. They convinced themselves they were in control. That they had a firm grasp of the facts. They never saw the flock feeding them those facts… and those 'facts' turned one of them into a liar in front of millions, and the other into a corpse-maker in front of the world.

So who answers for it?

Robinson goes to prison. Fine. But the thing that made him, the thing that put the lie in Stephen's mouth and the target on Charlie's back… that thing gets to walk away clean and pick its next target. It always does.

The flock flies on.

Why does it get to keep flying? Why can't anyone stop it?

Because there's nothing to stop. The flock isn't physical, it's spiritual.

You can shoot a bird out of the sky. You can't shoot a belief. Kill the man who holds it, and it just moves to the man beside him. That's why the flock never breaks. You took Robinson out of it and it didn't even flinch.

The flock took out our most effective general, and your reward is locking up one confused young man who happened to pull the trigger. And even that, for you, is a struggle. You are tormented for months. Hoping you can get some small hint of justice… eventually.

This isn't the system failing you. It's the system telling you the truth. It's letting you know your place.

The one who can kill and answer to no one, that's the sovereign. That's who rules you. The one who has to beg the courts for months to sentence a single pawn… that's the subject. That's who is ruled.

The flock is your real Government, and it doesn't have a President or a Congress.

It has a vibe.

And sometimes, when that vibe feels threatened… it turns murderous.

Charlie threatened the vibe, so the vibe killed him.

Act 3

Charlie didn't just threaten the vibe. He was pulling people out of the flock. And it gets worse for them…

The martyr dies, and his rule begins.

Nobody knows the power of a martyr better than our friends, the progressives.

They are always fishing for a new one that they can use for themselves. Sometimes they even try to manufacture them. Have you noticed this? It never stops.

Smollett, the Bubba Wallace rope, the UVA hoax, hands-up-don't shoot… do I need to keep going? I haven't even gotten to the heavy hitters yet.

Let's start with Saint George Floyd.

Do you think a single solitary leftist or democrat politician genuinely gave a shit about George Floyd? Do you think Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were just so full of grief for poor George, that they couldn't help but take a knee in Kente cloth in front of all those cameras in D.C.? It's just a matter of basic decency! These are decent people, doing decent things… can't you tell?

Look at Mayor Jacob Frey crying over George's coffin. Weeping like a baby. It's because he just cares so much about black lives, you see. He's really broken up about poor George.

It's not grief… it's politics.

This is what progressives do... this is how they operate. They are fishing for a martyr that they can use to ram their agenda down your throat… and they'll never stop fishing.

Floyd is already fading. Six years later, even their own side is quietly moving on. The progressives already milked that cow for all the political capital it's worth, and now, it's starting to become a liability. Time to look away, pretend it never happened.

But not all of them fade. Floyd lasted six years. Their masterpiece has lasted sixty and counting.

Martin Luther King Jr.

The founding Saint of the Civil Rights religion. Complete with a holy day, scripture and heresy. To disagree isn't to be wrong, it's to be evil. Progressives finally secured the power to define all opposition as a moral crime. Racism.

Every institution in America bent the knee. Some of them literally, on television, before a football game.

It's taught to your children as gospel.

You've felt it. That little flinch when the subject comes up. You have to be careful with your words all of a sudden. You can smell the power lurking around you, watching you.

So, the progressives know the power of a good martyr, quite intimately. And you can bet that they know the danger of handing one to their enemies… their subjects, who they intend to rule.

And with Charlie, they know exactly what they've done. They handed us one.

If Charlie was the monster they said he was, the people who celebrated his murder are just normal people. Relieved. A bad man died.

But if he wasn't... then they cheered the murder of a father of two.

There is no third option… and they know which version they need for their story to work.

And so, he has to stay a monster. They can never let your grandchildren meet the man. The one that Sebastian met.

They have to kill him twice.

Act 4

"1 Nazi down." An art teacher in Iowa posted that within hours of the murder.

Have you noticed how many teachers hate Charlie? Some of them have the good sense to keep it to themselves, but a lot of them wanted you to know. They wanted your children to know.

"Thoughts and prayers to his children, but America became greater today." A social studies teacher in South Carolina said that proudly, right there on his Facebook page.

In Texas alone, the state moved to suspend the teaching licenses of more than a hundred of them.

Those are just the ones who got caught, because they said it out loud, under their own names. That's the only reason we even know about them. Nobody knows how many teachers felt exactly the same way and said nothing. That number is bigger… much bigger. And every one of them went to work the next morning raising the next generation of the flock.

That classroom is the battleground Charlie spent his life trying to take.

He had to drive across the country and fight for every minute, in front of kids who'd been taught to hate him before he arrived.

These teachers don't have to do any of that. They get handed a classroom with a government paycheck, and the culture tells them they're the real heroes.

The flock flies on.

And it didn't stop at the teachers. It went all the way up to Washington DC.

Days after Charlie was murdered, the House brought up a resolution to honor him. Nothing complicated, just basic decency. Honor the dead man, a good friend of the sitting President.

Well, that offended some people. AOC, a sitting Congresswoman, voted no on the resolution, and walked up to the microphone.

She called the murder horrific and vile. Then she read the charges.

We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was; a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted Black Americans the right to vote was a mistake.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez • House floor • September 19, 2025

She's got the wrong law. The voting one came a year later, and it's called the Voting Rights Act. She didn't do a basic fact check, she just uncritically fused two laws together to put the worst possible case against Charlie into the public record.

His body was barely cold.

She wasn't there to be fair. She was there, at the hour meant to mourn him, to desecrate his corpse.

Death was not enough.

Three weeks later, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar sat down with Don Lemon and said this.

But there is no legacy to honor. It was a legacy filled with bigotry, hatred, and White supremacy. And as a Black woman and as a Muslim in this country, I refuse to join the chorus that changes the history of what is on the record from this man.

Ilhan Omar • on Don Lemon's show • September 2025

That's on the record now too.

A sitting Congresswoman. A schoolteacher in Iowa. A kid on a roof in Utah.

Tyler Robinson wasn't uniquely evil. He was the only man on that roof. He was not the only one who wanted Charlie dead.

The kid who carved "hey fascist" into the bullets believed the exact same thing as the teacher who typed "1 Nazi down." Same ideology. Same hatred.

The only difference between them is one trigger pull.

And that's how the flock operates. They're not all killers. They don't need to be. The signal goes out, and the ones who'll do it find their way to the target eventually.

That's exactly what they did to Charlie. They'd been screaming "fascist" at him for years. It's on their media feeds, in their classrooms, their newspapers, their Discord servers… then one of them carved the word into a bullet and put it through his neck.

Signal sent. Signal received. One less effective enemy to contend with.

The flock flies on.

So, that's how Charlie's enemies have treated him. It's to be expected, that's what enemies do… but now we have to talk about one of his "friends."

Candace Owens.

And to understand what she's doing, you first have to be clear on what she's looking at. What actually happened to Charlie, because it was never a mystery.

We have all the evidence you could ever want to convict Tyler Robinson.

It was his own father who recognized him, and turned him in.

He confessed to his parents. He confessed again in texts to his boyfriend, the night of the murder. His DNA was on the towel the rifle was wrapped in. There's camera footage of him on the roof.

And the motive? He carved that into the bullets himself. Weeks before, he sat down with an engraving tool and etched his slogans into the ammunition. "Hey fascist! Catch!" "Bella ciao," the old antifascist anthem.

Candace knew Charlie. She built her career inside his movement.

And she looked at every last piece of what you just read. A father turning in his own son. The confession. The texts. The bullets he engraved with his own hands.

And she decided none of it was real.

She even became a ballistics expert in the process.

So, if it wasn't the confessed leftist with a trans boyfriend who killed Charlie, who was it? Well, Candace is just asking questions, you see.

Was it Israel? Just wondering! And Erika, his widow, standing over his casket… how much did she really know? Was somebody on his own security team in on it? And is there even a body? Was he quietly cremated to destroy the evidence?

She's just curious. She wants to get at the truth. No question is off the table!

Or…

She's not curious. She's casting doubt. Building a defense, not just for the killer, but for the whole flock he flew with.

She looked at Tyler, confessed, his own father turning him in, motive carved into the bullets, his DNA on the towel the rifle was wrapped in, and called him innocent. She offered to help his defense.

If Tyler Robinson's defense would like to contact me, I'd be happy to supply them the folder of the maroon boys that I began archiving when I noticed the bizarre fashion trend.

Candace Owens • July 9, 2026

His own lawyers wouldn't touch a word of it. Why do you think that is? Are they in on the conspiracy too?

I'm not going after her for being wrong. Wrong is allowed. Questions are allowed.

Her crime is what the questions are for.

She's not looking for answers. She took the one thing that could make Charlie's death mean something… a good man, murdered by the left for telling the truth… and she buried it in a fog of doubt. She handed his real killers their alibi. She turned our martyr into a mystery.

People love a good mystery. Mix in some true crime and drama, and you have a hit story for YouTube that can pay out millions in ad revenue. It's one of the most watched things on the internet.

But a mystery organizes no one… it changes nothing… it just fades when people get bored and find the next shiny conspiracy video to pursue. Which is exactly what the flock wanted all along.

The flock marked him. Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger. And it's Candace Owens and her supporters covering the killers' tracks.

It's not curiosity. It's politics.

Act 5

You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies.

Charlie Kirk • 2016

Not long before he was murdered, Charlie Kirk sat down for an interview. He had no idea it would be his last.

The last question: What is a quote that you live by?

He talks about his faith, then he says this:

There is a God, and I am not him, and I surrender to His will.

Charlie Kirk • in his final interview • September 10, 2025

Charlie would never submit to the flock, because he had already submitted to a power that sits above it.

He had less than an hour left.

He walks out to that campus in Utah.

That big goofy smile on full display, mint teas sitting on the card table in front of him, while a huge crowd of patriots and progressives congregate to see him.

Everyone knew who the man of power on campus was, instinctively. All eyes were upon him.

For twelve years he would not go away.

So that's it. His story ends here. Charlie Kirk doesn't get to see his kids grow up. He doesn't get to grow old with Erika.

Then there's us. We lost our best General. The man who would walk into enemy territory and start recruiting the flock's most precious asset. Its youth.

Now what? Do we all set up our own card tables at the universities and copy what Charlie did?

Anybody can buy a card table, set it up on a campus and start talking to students. Plenty of people are doing that now, in Charlie's honor… but that was never the magic.

A kid argues with you for a few minutes then walks away. Maybe you get a viral clip. Okay. That's energy. But where does that energy go?

What made Charlie dangerous is that he was converting that energy into power. There was somewhere for that kid to go next. Campus chapters, staff jobs, and a national conference every year. Something that kept moving after the card table was folded up and put back in the closet.

The magic was in what Charlie was building. The machinery. That's what scared the flock.

We want to be an institution in this country that is as well-known and as powerful as The New York Times, Harvard and tech companies. And we believe we're creating that.

Charlie Kirk • Deseret News • August 19, 2025

An institution that reliably turns the flock's own heirs into a coalition that refuses to submit to it.

Do you see why he had to go?

And now, the flock moves on to its next targets. His family. His supporters. His institution. It all has to go. You have to go.

You can keep moving forward, but you will be punished. Shamed. If you become too effective, you will be shot at. That's the game. That's your "marketplace of ideas."

If nobody wants you dead, you're not playing.

You are in a spiritual war against a thing that rules America and answers to nobody in it. There is no court above it. There is no election that removes it.

So the question is. Who are you going to submit to?

There's a reader of mine. His name is John. He watched Charlie get shot while sitting on a nursing home bed, next to his dying mother.

She died that Thanksgiving.

At her burial, John stood up and spoke to her. This is part of what he said.

And the truth is, on one September afternoon, I was sitting with you in the nursing home and we saw the murder of Charlie Kirk. He was a truth teller. A soldier of God. You saw how it moved me and it did. Since then I've been going to church. Trying to renew my faith. Trying to be the person you always knew I could be... The next time I visited you, in October, I was wearing a cross... You seemed happier for me than I've seen you in a while. I will keep trying to make you proud. I love you mom.

John • at his mother's burial

A Soldier of God.

Bear your cross, soldier.

~ Clay

Pass it on

If you recognized the flock, you're who I write for.

This piece took a month. No advertiser was ever going to pay for it. Patrons did, and they read it first. 64 charter seats left at $13 a month, locked for life. Become a patron.

Not ready for that? The writing goes out free by email, nearly every day.

Comments

Coins are how patrons highlight the best comments. Join and you get yours.

  • A
    AnsonFounder21

    I always admired Charlie for speaking out what he believed in, and never being hateful as the leftists would slander him about. To talk about concepts and explore them. The way he would hold the value of free speech above all else. So it was quite the shock when I saw people I thought friends celebrate his assassination as though "their team" won. A man whose only crime was speaking truths that they didn't like to hear and debate.

    Desecration is an apt description. They couldn't win against the man in a debate, because his sole purpose was to cite reality, promote American values based off the founding fathers and his Christian faith. And for speaking, for simply saying "I believe this is true, let's discuss this" they celebrated his murder.

    There is no co-existence possible with these heretics who deny what I once thought were common values, but now I see is far more fragile than that. They will not value the ideas that have given birth to Western civilisation, as they detest responsibility and accountability. So there can be no peace with the heretic and the traitor. Once upon a time I would've considered those words extreme. That we could all live in peace if we just discussed things. Now? We've seen what happens if you debate peacefully.

    Stand up for freedom of speech, and that the safety of civilians is more important than the right of criminals. That those who reject society should be exiled or removed from it.

    Rest in peace Charlie. We'll carry on your burden.

    4
    • Z
      ZakFounder48

      Why I left the Methodist Church when I was a teenager.

    • M
      mary S.Founder30

      @Zak There is some turmoil there. I breaks my heart.

    • M
      mary S.Founder30

      Wonderful response.

    • C
      ClayAuthor

      The friends part is what gets everybody, Anson. I get notes from readers about it all the time. People they thought they knew, glad about it.

      You said: "Once upon a time I would've considered those words extreme."

      That's the thing. When they killed Charlie, they moved a lot of quiet people to start looking at them very differently.

      They still don't understand. They will.

  • M
    Mary J.Founder10

    Clay... Powerful, and reaching our souls, not just our eyes and ears. This is why I joined your group. The unwrapping and exposing of what's really going on in our insane world today at deep levels. Easy to read, speaks to our hearts. And hopefully many, many others. It needs to be heard, far and wide. I just mis-typed that as "wise" and thought how that might not have been an accident! Your wisdom, the depth and care you take to write the very best you can dredge from within you, and the way you present it to be so profoundly logical and easy to absorb, is your gift. Thank you!

    2
    C
    ClayAuthor

    Mary, I'll keep that typo!

    The part that is "easy to absorb" is the part that I suffer for. There were many sleepless nights and angry writing sessions involved in getting this one right. It was all worth it just to read your comment.

  • M
    mary S.Founder30

    Your Quote to open this is so appropriate. I am reminded of the quote "No man is an island"; ( I know there is more but for this purpose it must be true) if we are to survive as a people who live in freedom. We truly are in a "battlefield" is ideas and Ideals. If Charlie was Giant sized he needed to be to match his calling. Your inclusion of the flock of birds as an example of how society turns into a sort of Mob Rule by being lazy, by not challenging the lies and propaganda that distorts the truth and poison the water we drink daily without questioning its purity is perfect. Charlie won others by first knowing as fully as possible what he was talking about. He won others by having a conversation that could connect the dots to the truth with out being a bully.
    Minds are hard to change once a conclusion is reached within. I am guilty of this and it isn't bad if my mind is still willing to listen to the thoughts of another without being offended or offending. When you ask the right questions and don't browbeat your listener, you might be able to plant a seed
    and that is a good thing.
    Jesus came to us and when the time was right He began teaching truth about His Father in heaven but He too faced a Flock; the religious leaders of the time who feared His message. Jesus was murdered. His followers who carried His message also were murdered ;2000 years and we still hear His message. Charlie is reaching more hearts that ever. What am I willing to give?
    This piece is awesome

    2
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Mary, you took the flock somewhere I didn't. He faced one too, and it worked the same way it works now.

      I gave you my coin for this one.

      God bless you.

  • W
    walkerlllpCharter8(edited)

    Clay, you have hit a chord. Sometimes tough to realize that the “flock” or the “machine” has so much power. Very “Matrix” like. Your words had me despondent and feeling a bit like David must have felt when squaring off with Goliath. I only hope truth wins as it should be.
    I did move from despondency to hope by your words. But I also know hope is not a strategy. This battle must be joined.

    1
    C
    ClayAuthor

    Thank you, Walker. Despondent first, then hope. That's the order I built it in, so I'm glad it hit you that way around.

    Hope is not a strategy. But without it… what's the point of even having one?

  • R
    RitaFounder25Hunter

    This made me angry. This brought tears to my eyes. This is unadulterated truth. I felt the agony in this composition and I felt its raw power. Thank you for the blood in these words.

    1
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Rita, this comment hit me hard enough that today's email was built around it. The subject line is yours, word for word. I couldn't improve on it, so I didn't try.

      God bless you.

  • R
    Robert W.Founder34

    I think you have done a great service with this article. You are not railing or shouting, but have explained your thoughts and shown your work. I was struck in your article and many of the other discussions of Mr. Kirk's life and death have to include some discussion of God. Mr. Kirk declared God and His Glory in both words and, more importantly, in his life. As a fellow believer, I believe Mr. Kirk would say that he was only doing what God wanted him to do and he was only able because God made him able. God may not raise up another Charlie Kirk, but He will, without a doubt, raise up who He wants to do as He wills. Moses, when faced with the presence of God in the burning bush, said (my paraphrase), "you've got the wrong guy." Charlie Kirk went as God led. Will we?

    0
  • B
    BrandonFounder17

    Another excellent piece, Clay. You hit the nail on the head, as always!

    0
    C
    ClayAuthor

    Thanks, man!

  • M
    MichaelFounder3

    Very well written and spot on. Everything you talked about is true. I had really just began to follow Charlie a few months before his assassination. It hit me hard. I loved the fact that he was at times firm, but I never saw him be “mean” or even mean spirited. I still miss him, which I never really imagined myself doing for this long for someone I have never met. The part about Candace Owens was too kind to her. She and a few more “conservatives” are doing a great deal of damage to what Charlie was fighting for in my opinion. I hope I’m wrong, but I’m afraid that the division they’re creating will hand the left a victory in November. Keep up the good work!

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Michael, thank you for this.

      I think a lot of us are shocked at just how much we cared about Charlie. We had no idea until he was gone.

      On Candace, I hear you. There was part of me that wanted to go all in on her. There's a part of me that wants to dedicate a full piece to what's going on there.

      For this piece, I didn't want it to become about her. She needed to be exposed for what she's doing, but I didn't want to go down into those rabbit holes.

      I hope, at the very least, I made it clear what her effect is, regardless of what her intentions may be. That was my goal.

  • K
    Kent W.Founder7

    "And that's how the flock operates. They're not all killers. They don't need to be. The signal goes out, and the ones who'll do it find their way to the target eventually."

    That's perspicacious Clay.

    I'm glad I got to see him on the campus of Oregon State University near my home in October of 2024. It was hot outside, but there was Charlie under his tent fielding questions.

    Hindsight is 20/20, but I remember being pissed off that September 10th, wondering why his security detail didn't factor in snipers (ala Crooks in Butler, PA) and that damn campus in Utah apparently wasn't surveilled with drones. I don't want to hear about bureaucratic hurdles from his security team. The kill shot was too easy.

    Thanks for writing this. I'll be sharing it.

    Kent W

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      You got to see the man work his magic with your own eyes. That's more than most of us got.

      And I'm with you on the security. Butler should have settled the argument about whether that gap is real. This is something that right-wingers have to take seriously.

      The harsh truth is... human beings just aren't that hard to kill. Soft flesh. Slip up for a second, and a determined predator can make his move.

      Thanks for passing it on.

  • S
    Sean ThomasFounder24

    …by a class of people who consider themselves to be the rightful managers of America…There it is right there. Power, control. …And we’re the fascists. Jesus said it best when he said “Forgive them, for they know not what they do”.

    0
    • P
      PaulFounder45

      I think it's basically blasphemous (certainly, presumptuous) for us to call on God to "Forgive them, for they know not what they do." We are not Jesus; so, we simply don't possess that authority. (Also, those who crucified him were carrying out - unbeknownst to themselves - an essential role in God's plan of redemption for mankind.) The best we can offer is, "Reveal to them what they do, so that they may repent and receive forgiveness." That, too, is a powerful and loving request, but one that does not attempt to short-cut God's offer of mercy.

      That's not a criticism of your intent. It's meant to be a clearer way of expressing what I perceive to be your desire.

    • S
      Sean ThomasFounder24

      @Paul my intention here is not to call on God to forgive them, but to illustrate the absolute unwillingness to even attempt to understand the position that Charlie took and the message that he was carrying to the young people he spoke to. I am also not comparing Charlie to Jesus by any stretch of the imagination, only the absolute rejection of Charlie’s message to the point of silencing him permanently and the potential, long term repercussions of that. Hence, they know not what they do.

    • P
      PaulFounder45

      @SeanThomas Ah - I get that. Thanks for clarifying.

  • C
    ClaireFounder9(edited)

    Beautifully constructed piece Clay.

    What struck me was a silent suggestion pointing to your reasoning behind this site; creating an environment where we can identify strategies to fight against flock narratives.

    “The flock is your real Government, and it doesn't have a President or a Congress. It has a vibe.
    And sometimes, when that vibe feels threatened… it turns murderous.
    Charlie threatened the vibe, so the vibe killed him.“

    I had to look up flock murmuring. Based on the positions and movements of their nearest neighbors, each bird follows a few basic behavioral rules: don’t collide, match speed, and stay close (🤔). Often used as a protection strategy against predators.

    The powers that be saw Charlie as a predator threatening their flock.
    Sometimes they will intentionally sacrifice one of their own for the sake of the whole, and then they make this one a martyr, (Floyd, MLK, etc), but they can’t abide the predator. The predator must be demonized. So Charlie had to be eliminated and his reputation destroyed.

    My only disagreement comes from your statement about Stephen King. He knew exactly what he was doing. The reason I say this that I have studied his rhetoric and behavior for a long time because my kid idolizes him and I’m pretty particular about knowing who and what is an influence in my kid’s life. And it is an act of spiritual warfare.

    Thank you for another thought provoking essay.

    May God continue to bless and protect you always.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Claire, this is an amazing comment.

      "The powers that be saw Charlie as a predator threatening their flock."

      That's exactly right! And notice how the flock always portrays itself as a helpless victim. They are the oppressed. The ones rising up against the powerful. That's the story they believe.

      On King, you may well be right. I can't prove what he knew, so all I did was write down what he did, and I gave him the benefit of the doubt. That's the grace element of my doctrine.

      But you are perceptive, and I wouldn't bet against your judgement on him.

    • C
      ClayAuthor(edited)

      Also, you totally made me laugh with "stay close (🤔)".

      Perceptive. Like I said.

    • C
      ClaireFounder9

      @Clay ❣️

    • C
      ClaireFounder9(edited)

      @Clay I can’t wait to share this piece with everyone. I’m praying that it reaches the eyes that need to see it, the minds that need to be opened by it, and a whole bunch of “Charlies” will be inspired to build upon his legacy. It’s time for new conversations to begin.

  • T
    TrishFounder37

    I know both too much and too little about the main chords of this symphony to critique it without exposing too much for everyone.

    I will say Bravo, though, because if there is to be a single coherent story about Charlie Kirk that fully encapsulates his life, his work, his beliefs, his death, the handling of his murdered body, and yes, his messy martyrdom, this is it.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      I'm intrigued about those main chords, Trish. That's a hell of a hook!

      Thank you for that very high praise. I am proud of this one. My hope now is to get it into as many minds as we can.

  • S
    SusanFounder11(edited)

    THIS is the reason I support you. Giving credence, clear and convincing break down of the real hierarchy in place within this country and its government. This heirarchy isn't new, only new to modern man. Long forgotten. Yes, to some it is and has been clearly spiritual in it's essence, thank you for bringing it forward from what many thought or accused others as fallacy, or conspiratorial thinking. You ARE growing ☺️ and I'm pleased to watch it take hold. Absolutely on point about martyrdom. It has begun, with your help and others who see truth plainly we should begin to see the scales tip in favor of Truth and Godliness. Discernment.
    On aside: do you consider it a possibility the nebulous they are already in progress of creating their new martyr? In the name of Anthony Fauci?

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Thank you, Susan. This really means a lot. I'm honored to have earned your support.

      On the aside: They can canonize anybody they like, and they do it constantly. It doesn't always work, but they always take the shot.

      A fake one takes a story, and stories come apart. Smollett, UVA. A real one takes a body, and nobody schedules that.

      They don't make those, they wait for them.

  • G
    Granny JennyCharter29

    Yes. This. The only plane you didn't land for me, though...Candace. "Politics"? I'd like more there. Is there a framework for what she thinks she's doing, as opposed to what she's actually doing? Or does that involve too much speculation? Other than that, I resonate with every word.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Jenny, that's the one plane I left circling on purpose. You caught it.

      Too much speculation is the answer. I don't know what's going through Candace's mind, and I wasn't willing to guess at it in a piece like this. Motive is the one thing nobody can prove... and the second I speculate on hers, I've handed her defenders something to argue about.

      So all I did was watch what she does. And what she does looks like the cover-up of a crime.

      It's very possible, even likely, that she believes she's pursuing justice, digging to get to the bottom of what really happened. Doesn't matter to me. The actions speak loud enough.

      Glad you pushed on it. This is the first real pushback I've received, and It's always welcome. I hope I gave you a satisfying answer.

    • G
      Granny JennyCharter29

      @Clay that makes sense. Obviously, she's not helping Charlie's cause...like you, I doubt she sees it. Which doesn't make it less maddening to watch. I feel like you could have placed her more squarely in a bubble alongside the "losertarian" one, floating alongside the murmuring without affecting it in the least. But perhaps that's too kind, because she may be peeling off folks from Charlie's flock.

    • C
      ClayAuthor(edited)

      @GrannyJenny Yes, you know what Jenny. You just put your finger on something.

      I had a whole losertarian section in this piece that I cut out. I was going to make the Candace section bigger and include some other characters, including some of the losertarians, but I really didn't want it to become about them.

      But one quibble with your last line. Charlie didn't have a flock. That's the entire difference. A flock has no leader. Charlie built a machine with names and offices and a payroll, and that's what made him killable.

      So Candace isn't peeling birds off a murmuration. She's talking people out of organization, and running the defense for the actual killer in the court of public opinion… which is worse.

    • G
      Granny JennyCharter29

      @Clay thanks for the correction. Btw, loved your comment under @walkerlllp but can't see how to leave a response there.

    • C
      ClayAuthor(edited)

      @GrannyJenny Good morning, Jenny. It should work the same way it does here. Can you tell me what kind of issue you're having? Is it not showing the 'reply' button under the posts?

      Thanks!

    • G
      Granny JennyCharter29

      @Clay yes, there's a reply button. No reaction button though, which is what I'm after. Sorry to not be clear. It's turning into a rough weekend for us. Appreciate you all.

  • P
    PatrickFounder50

    Not bad, sir. For me, the welcome mat for the rule of Charlie's martyrdom includes you.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Thank you, Patrick. That's the kind of thing that keeps a man at his desk.

  • R
    RonFounder8

    Excellent work Clay.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Thank you, Ron!

  • Z
    ZakFounder48

    @Clay, very poignant and clear. I believe that every word is the truth. I was at my computer when I heard that Charlie Kirk was shot. Why?! Now we know.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      I, too, was at my computer when I heard about it. It all happened very fast. I'll never forget it.

  • P
    PaulFounder45

    Fantastic piece, Clay! The likening of the masses to the murmuring of birds is wonderfully illustrative. It's how they *know* things that are unknowable (because they aren't true), and how they maintain plausible deniability. (It's funny, by the way, how apologies and retractions never seem to have the same reach as initial slanders and lies.)

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Thank you, Paul!

      The lie moves through the flock… the correction flies alone. The lie is exciting. The correction is like homework. Boring.

  • V
    VirginiaFounder20

    Thank you for putting this in to words that hit home. We know Who wins in the end but we are called to show His Light and His Truth as long as we live. The battle is His and we are His soldiers.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Thank you, Virginia. I'm really happy that the piece resonated with you.

      Stay close, soldier.

  • K
    KimFounder40

    I have a sob in the pit of my stomach because I recognize what you write is truth. Your writing is powerful, Clay.

    0
    • C
      ClayAuthor

      Thank you, Kim!

      That sob is the right response, Kim. I felt it the entire time I was writing it. I'm glad it came through.

The comments are for patrons.

Reading is free for everyone. The room behind the work is where patrons talk, and where I talk back.

Clay, founder of Stop Being Prey

About the writer

Clay

Clay is the author of Stop Being Prey. Software engineer by trade. Writer by necessity. Twenty years inside libertarianism, out for good. Hosts the largest Thomas Sowell page on Facebook. Now writing the right's missing strategic playbook.

Audio Edition

Reader-supported. Add your name to the Wall.

Read this next