stopbeingprey.com/prisoner
The Prisoner and the Podcasters
He made his choice. Now the libertarians have to make theirs.
“I want you to understand what it means to lose your freedom.”
He said that five times in a speech to a Bitcoin conference. He gave it over a collect call from a maximum security penitentiary.
Every few minutes an automated voice cut in over him:
This call is from a federal prison.
He told them about the hole…
He once spent four months straight in there. He had air… stale and foul, but air. Food through a slot in the door. Other than that, it was just a lifeless hole.
And the hole wasn't the worst of it. It was the knowing that even once you're out of the hole, you're still not free… and you never will be again.
He was given two life sentences plus 40 years, with no chance for parole.
This is hell.
You can't even escape it in your dreams, when you sleep…
In the dream I was free. I was in a park, and I felt this huge relief… and then the anxiety just woke me up. And there I was again, in the hole… Life without parole. Maximum security. There's no end in sight.
He knew what talking to that crowd might cost him. He told them so.
I'm afraid that because of what I'm saying to you today, I'll be thrown in the hole, or worse.
He was right. That's exactly what they did.
His name is Ross Ulbricht.
On the night of September 10th, 2026, an arena in Dallas went silent. One year to the day since Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
One seat was left empty. An American flag was draped across it, and a white card sat on the chair:
Saved for Charlie.
They played a five-minute video of him, and the whole arena stopped talking.
Then they started chanting his name.
Charlie! Charlie! Charlie!
Charlie was a big part of why Ross was free. He never took credit for it.
The morning after Charlie was killed, Ross told the world.
After the 2024 election, Trump asked Charlie what the number one thing he could do for him was. Charlie said: "Free Ross."
At 31, my life was taken from me for standing up for what I believed in. And Charlie helped me get it back.
Less than an hour after the crowd chanted Charlie's name, Ross took the stage.
When you are in prison, there is a certain sound that a steel door makes when it closes behind you and you are locked inside. I heard that sound every day for over 11 years.
Five years ago, he told a crowd of libertarians and Bitcoiners what it means to lose your freedom… over a prison phone.
Now he was telling an arena full of Republicans… as a free man.
He thanked the man who freed him:
Thank you, Mr. President. You gave me my life back, sir.
He meant it. You can hear him choking back tears.
Trump had made a promise at the Libertarian National Convention in 2024… to a crowd that booed him from the moment he walked out. Some turned their backs on him. People held up signs:
Free Ross
He told them that if they voted for him, on Day 1, he would commute Ross's sentence to time served.
For one line, the room cheered… then they went back to jeering.
Trump kept the promise. More than that… he didn't just commute the sentence, he granted Ross a full pardon on his second day in office.
He didn't need the libertarians anymore. He'd already won. He did it anyway.
When he signed the pardon, he called Ross's mother, and said he'd done it "in honor of her and the Libertarian Movement." Then he posted that the people who convicted Ross were "some of the same lunatics" behind the weaponization of government against him.
He wasn't just letting a man out of prison. He was telling Ross and every libertarian who fought for him: we're in this together.
Ross understood:
He felt compassion for me because he, too, was a target of a weaponized government.
Then he brought up his fellow libertarians.
Now, sometimes I hear from the very people he made that campaign promise to… that after he freed me, he lost focus on the cause of liberty.
Ross is being generous with the word "sometimes." The truth is, many of the biggest libertarian influencers have their knives out for the one man who actually freed him… and for the coalition that stood behind him.
And look… some of their anger is earned. I'll get to that.
The night Ross walked free in January 2025, the Libertarian Party's 2024 presidential nominee, Chase Oliver, refused to thank Trump for it. Trump, he wrote, had "prioritized renaming the Gulf of Mexico over his Day 1 promise."
The pardon came one day late.
A year and a half later, on the morning of Ross's speech, the Libertarian Party's official account called Trump a "true Communist."
Even Dave Smith, who played a critical role in getting Ross freed. Two days after Massie lost his primary, he went on a panel show and declared war:
Now, I'm just one guy, but I am fairly influential with some of the most influential people in this country… You've made an enemy out of the libertarians, and now enjoy.
Four months later, on his podcast he played a clip of Ted Cruz saying Republicans need libertarians to show up in November. His answer:
So, sorry Ted, we will not be coming out for you. You cannot count on libertarians in droves to save the Republicans in the midterms. I have a feeling you guys are going down.
He told you himself: he's influential, and he knows it. That's a flex.
Dave has a giant audience, that's true… but he's mistaking it for power.
That audience couldn't save Massie, who lost by ten points. It couldn't free Ross without Trump… it couldn't even win Clint Russell the Libertarian VP nomination… and the only thing it can do now is help the Progressive coalition win.
Whether he means to or not, that's what he's doing.
So is Clint.
That same night, a few hours after Ross spoke, Trump joked from that same stage that if you don't vote, "you go to hell." Clint's reply:
We're already in hell and I fully intend to take the GOP with me.
Ross knows what hell is.
In 2021, Clint sat down with Ross's mother, Lyn, for an episode called "Free Ross!!!" He called it the most important episode he'd ever done.
Five years later, Ross stood in an arena and answered the libertarians himself.
Clint hasn't said a word about it on his show. Neither has Dave. I checked. I went through every episode either of them has put out since Ross's speech.
As far as they're concerned, it never happened.
And on September 25th, still angry about Massie, Clint posted this to the Republicans:
…we're gonna make it very clear that you can't win without us. Fuck. All of. You.
"All of you" includes Ross now, Clint.
Think about what that means. If Dave and Clint get their way, the coalition that freed Ross loses power in November… and it goes to the party that put him in that cell.
Back in June, I asked this question in "The Thomas Massie Problem":
I cannot stop wondering what Ross thinks of these supporters right now. What does the man getting his life back think of his loudest defenders trying to destroy the man who gave it to him? … They know whose signature is on the pardon.
Now I have my answer.
Ross is standing right beside the man who signed it.
And to the people who say Trump lost focus on liberty, Ross answered them:
That's not true. It's just easy to miss all of his wins for liberty among the torrent of headlines out there.
Then he listed them:
Hundreds of ordinary Americans pardoned, people you've never heard of.
The government pushed banks to debank Americans for what they believed, or where they shopped… or for using Bitcoin. People lost their businesses not for breaking a law, but for being the wrong sort of citizen.
Gun dealers who lost their licenses over paperwork, back in business.
Veterans with severe trauma, finally allowed medicine the government had criminalized for half a century.
Social media companies no longer pressured by the federal government to silence Americans for what they say online.
Parents who spoke up at school board meetings no longer treated like terrorists.
This is practically a libertarian wish list, and almost nobody's talking about it… least of all, the libertarian podcasters.
He ended his speech like this:
I stand here tonight a free man and you are free Americans. And that is thanks to him.
So here we are, libertarians. You have a choice to make this November.
I'm not going to sit here and lecture you about Trump. He's done some things I can't defend. I'm not going to tell you you're wrong about Iran. Or the spending.
You were courted in 2024. You showed up.
And then Trump went and did some very unlibertarian things. You got a war you didn't want. A spending bill that makes you sick…
And then your favorite congressman, the most principled libertarian in Congress, got taken out.
You felt like you were being told to see yourselves out.
I get it. I'd be angry too. You're even right about a lot of it.
But being right was never your problem.
Power is what makes ideas matter. Without power, you don't have ideas… you have a hobby.
Ross is the proof. More than a decade of being right didn't open his cell. Power did.
I don't want you to lose anymore. I want you to win. Ross is what winning looks like. It's ugly… it's not perfect… far from it, but it's real. He's free.
Back in May, I gave you a test:
The libertarian test is the simplest possible question. Are you going to help Trump in the midterms or not?
Are you going to swallow your pride and vote Republican in your district? Or are you going to perform purity, vote third party, sit it out, and let the progressives take Congress back?
That is the test. The jokers will fail it. The serious libertarians will pass it.
Which one are you?
I'll be honest… I was worried Ross would fail. He's a libertarian, after all. They're loyal to principles, not people… and Trump is no libertarian.
He passed. Even with the loudest voices in his corner telling everyone Trump had betrayed them.
Now it's your turn.
One coalition put Ross in a cage he was never supposed to leave alive. The other set him free.
One saved Charlie a seat. You saw what the other did.
Ross is you. Charlie is you.
On November 3rd, stand beside Ross, with the coalition that freed him.
Vote Republican for your House seat. Especially if it hurts.
“I want you to understand what it means to lose your freedom.”
stay close,
~ Clay
p.s. The day before this piece went public, a fan asked Dave about Ross's speech. His answer: "Haven't watched it… I saw a brief clip, I respectfully disagree."
This only exists because readers pay for it. No sponsors, no advertisers, nobody I answer to but the people inside. If you want more of it, come inside. 64 charter seats left at $13 a month, locked for life. Become a patron.
I'm writing a book. Join before November 3rd and your name can go in it.
Not ready for that? The writing goes out free by email, nearly every day.
Comments
Coins are how patrons highlight the best comments. Join and you get yours.
- PPaulFounder45
I recognized approximately two decades ago that the Demon party literally offers me NOTHING. Nothing that I want, at any rate. In the intervening years, it has progressed from awful to downright dangerous. (Just ask Ross or Donald.) There is only one other viable option - no matter how much I or anyone else wishes it were otherwise - so, I have been a Republican ever since. As a libertarian-turned-conservative, who retains many libertarian leanings, it's not an alliance that gives me warm fuzzies. I assure you that there are many Republicans who piss me off - never mind Trump. But to abandon the Republican party is to empower the Demon party. There is no better example of cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.
I've seen it work in both directions - where one wing of the party abandon's the other wing's primary winner. I have to confess that I've done it, myself. But we all NEED to recognize that the Demon party is enemy number one. Until it is dead and buried, the rest of us (including those who don't especially wish to be Republicans) cannot afford to hash-out our differences during general elections. That work must be done after general elections through primary elections. The results are the gauge of your power. Well, the power to lead. In weakness, you DO have power... to undermine - but only that which could offer a bulwark against what you REALLY don't want erected.
Swallow your pride and bitterness. Use your influence when it can make a positive impact.
2- GGranny JennyCharter29
"There is no better example of cutting off one's nose to spite one's face." And in this case, cutting off the nose sends the whole plane down. You get my coin, Paul.
- PPaulFounder45
@GrannyJenny Extending the "nose" analogy to a plane - fantastic!
- CClaireFounder9(edited)
This stood out as the most personal and persuasive part of this piece:
“I'll be honest… I was worried Ross would fail. He's a libertarian, after all. They're loyal to principles, not people… and Trump is no libertarian.
He passed. Even with the loudest voices in his corner telling everyone Trump had betrayed them.
Now it's your turn.”
Every day I see libertarian talking heads ranting about principles of liberty and the founding of America. They complain about the state of the economy and the wars. They never report the actual progress being made or the promises kept by President Trump.
I don’t understand how so many of them believe that taking revenge on President Trump and the Republicans, by either sitting out the midterms or voting for Democrats, will achieve their libertarian goals. Especially considering the very real possibility of socialists taking over Congress.
Perhaps that is their goal.
“Ross in a cage” might have carried more weight in their minds than a free Ross. After all, complaining about something when you know you don’t possess the power to change it absolves you of any responsibility to alter the situation.
And you get to keep the “soapbox” and purity badge while you’re rotting away in the gulag.Ross lived through the tyranny others will never experience.
He recognized the gift of freedom given by a man who could have reneged on his promise.Ross is choosing the only path to greater liberty.
May the others do the same.
2- CClayAuthor
You saw something I didn't write, Claire. A cause is easier to keep than a win. Great comment.
- AAlanCharter100
"They're loyal to principles, not people… "
Really? We criticize the left, and rightly so, for thinking with their emotions rather than their intellect. Spiteful, antagonistic, angry, prideful, in many ways disconnected from reality. Reading what libertarians are quoted as saying here is disappointingly similar. I generally agree with libertarian principles that closely align with Conservatism, principles that benefit humanity when put into practice. But unfortunately, the disconnect between libertarians themselves and the libertarian principles they espouse is apparently just as wide as the disconnect between the left and objective reality.
1- PPaulFounder45
I already spent my coin; but this hits the bulls-eye.
- TTrishFounder37
In the same way that reading posts saying, "I didn't agree with Charlie Kirk, but he didn't deserve to die," enrages me every time I see it, the "I don't like everything Trump is doing, but we need to vote for him," argument enrages me. And I'm saying this to someone I respect and admire, in every aspect.
Charlie did not deserve to die, period. I don't give a rat's ass if you agree with him or not. He did not deserve to die. This is not a message that should be diluted in any way whatsoever. Dilution communicates doubt about your claim, and disrespect for the profundity of his wrongful death.
Voting against Trump in this midterm is a vote that ultimately helps Democrat candidates win, and every single thing that you see for the next two years as the result of every Democrat win will redound to you and your actions. I don't give a rat's ass if you love everything Trump has done or not.
Either you vote for him, or you're inviting the Autopen brigade for yet another crack at running your life. This is the very same brigade that sent a man who operated a web site (and where am I saying this, exactly?) to maximum security prison with its hole of solitary confinement *for life.* To this day, Wikipedia describes him as an American cybercriminal; that will not wash off. Diluting the message disrespects the profundity of who made the choice and took the risk to liberate Ross from Hell, and it enrages me.
1- CClayAuthor
Trish, thank you for saying this.
I feel the same rage you do when someone says "I didn't agree with him, but..." Charlie didn't deserve to die. It's the decency disclaimer. It's in my arsenal of moves in The Arena. A common one.
But the piece doesn't do that. The decency disclaimer apologizes for a truth. I conceded their grievances... then asked for the vote anyway.
I do have problems with Trump. I do agree with the libertarians on many of their grievances with him. That's the truth. What I don't agree with is how libertarians behave.
And notice the ask didn't get softer. "Especially if it hurts" means vote Republican while you're still mad. That's a harder ask, not a softer one... and it's the thought I wanted them to walk away with.
I'm glad you pushed on it. Keep pushing.
- WwalkerlllpCharter8(edited)
From a recovering libertarian this is not only a must read, but a must act piece. Principles without power are akin to a car without a key; nice to have but you aren’t going anywhere.
Sometimes when reading or listening to former fellow libertarians, I find myself nodding my head and becoming righteous in my indignation. But for what? What are we but useful tools for those who have power already?
Other times, I get mad. Why? Because it appears when I really think about it, some of these libertarian voices are either unwittingly falling victim to their own power, the large audiences they engage, or they screaming at the clouds for a world that has never existed. I used to be the latter. Governance requires power and the sacrifice of at least some of your principles. Utopia doesn’t exist in the realm of humans.1CClayAuthor"Principles without power, a car without a key." Dead on, Walker.
- RRitaFounder25Hunter
All my years of fiercely clinging to the Libertarian ideal amounted to wasted votes and hollow passion. I finally opened my eyes to the truth and I fervently pray my fellows will do the same.
0- CClayAuthor
Rita, I know that feeling. It's hard to look back on. Glad you're here with us now.
- TTim WycislakFounder101(edited)
I'm voting Republican this election. I voted Libertarian since before Ross was jailed. Didn't make a bit of difference. We didn't win. Nothing changed. Then I voted for Donald. He kept his promise. Things changed. He does what he says he'll do. I like that. I like that a lot.
0- CClayAuthor
Tim, twenty years of votes and nothing changed. One vote and Ross walked out. That says it all.
- KKimFounder40
When I voted Libertarian, I can't count how many times I was told I was throwing my vote away. I always believed voting my conscience was most important and I was satisfied with my vote. I still lean Libertarian for the values as I understand them but have no delusion that a Libertarian can win without changes made. Always conservative, I will vote Republican.
Thank you for your writing, Clay.0- CClayAuthor
Kim... you can keep the values and still vote to win. That's not giving up your principles, it's giving them a chance. Thank you for this.
- SSue P.Charter49
Libertarians, I'll make this short and sweet. None of us get everything we want from our politicians or political parties, none of us. A seat is reserved for Libertarians at our republican table, we are willing to work with you. The other side of the isle extends no such offer. Do you truly want no chance in hell of getting your input being heard if the leftists win the midterms? I don't feel that your impact on the midterms is as powerful as you've been led to believe. What is very powerful is that we want you at our table, plain and simple. Libertarians voting 3rd party or not voting at all in an attempt to flex will gain you nothing but eye rolls and possibly a sigh or two. Join us at the midterms, and beyond, where you will be given opportunities to make meaningful changes. Those are the real flex. I guess that wasn't really short but it was sweet.
0- PPaulFounder45
I'll allow that libertarians (big or small "L") aren't necessarily wanted at ALL Republican tables. Insert yourselves anyway. You CAN get a hearing. But in the Democratic Socialists of America? Are you kidding me??? That's attempting to mix your oil with their water.
- CClayAuthor
A seat at the table. That's the invitation they need to hear. Thanks, Sue.
- GGranny JennyCharter29
"Trump, he wrote, had 'prioritized renaming the Gulf of Mexico over his Day 1 promise.' - The pardon came one day late..."
Huh. Seems Trump doesn't have the corner on pettiness. Or arrogance.
"If Dave and Clint get their way, the coalition that freed Ross loses power in November...and it goes to the party that put him in that cell."
Crazy where "performing purity" takes you. "Already in hell"? Seriously? It would be laughable if it wasn't beyond sad.
I truly hope many of these folks come around. We have enough mass psychoses. We need ALL the lone good guys to step up and say, they just can't get past Charlie, or Ross...or whoever the next ones will be if the "progressives" win the midterms.
0- PPaulFounder45
"Seems Trump doesn't have the corner on pettiness." I love this. The rest of it, too.
I need multiple coins to give!
- CClayAuthor
"Trump doesn't have the corner on pettiness." Ha! Chase Oliver sure proved that one, Jenny.
- NNathanFounder97
It may be trite, but this election is about freedom. Ross is looking at the facts, and he is staying principled. Libertarians, I too am angry at some of Trump's actions. But the midterms are the time to show progressives our country is still about liberty and freedom for all.
0- CClayAuthor
Not trite at all, Nathan. Angry and still showing up. That's exactly the ask.
- KKent W.Founder7
What a beautiful piece of writing. Ross is so lucky to have Clay and we him.
I shared the post because we need as many people as possible to read this.
Stay close all
0- CClayAuthor
Thank you, Kent!
stay close
The comments are for patrons.
Reading is free for everyone. The room behind the work is where patrons talk, and where I talk back.
Audio Edition
Reader-supported. Add your name to the Wall.
Read this next
The Losertarian Problem
Why libertarians lose, why conservatives are prey, why progressives became the apex predators, and why Trump and MAGA are the first counter-energy in two generations.
The Thomas Massie Problem
The libertarians say AIPAC took Massie out. The truth is harder, and it's why they always lose.
